Re: call to UV printers: was Fluorescent bulbs
Risa S. Horowitz (babbleon@terraport.net)
Tue, 1 Oct 1996 09:14:39 -0400
> what would be the
>ideal "acceptable" or "preferred" range for an artificail UV source? For
>example, I know someone who has been offered a unit (ex-lithographic /
>printing, I think) which takes bulbs with a wave length of 365 nm - I could
>not tell her whether this was in the acceptable range or not ...
>
>Any comments?
>
>Jonathan Anderson
>
>
Umm well, the unit I have in mind has a UV range that will make acceptable
gum, cyano and vandykes (and in the future plat/pall) :)
{see Risa run to the properties of light section in her Photo Techniques text}