Re: call to UV printers: was Fluorescent bulbs

j.r.anderson (j.r.anderson@mds.qmw.ac.uk)
Wed, 2 Oct 1996 08:39:28 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Risa S. Horowitz: "Sizing for gum"
Previous message: Gordon Smith: "Re: call to UV printers: was Fluorescent bulbs"
Maybe in reply to: Risa S. Horowitz: "call to UV printers: was Fluorescent bulbs"

>
>Any bulb nominally between 365 and 450 will be fine..... (Note that below
>350 the UV light is more harmful to humans.)
>
>Judy

Thanks for the expertise! The point you made about all the other
parameters, including my DNA, is duly noted and concurred with!

Jonathan

Next message: Risa S. Horowitz: "Sizing for gum"
Previous message: Gordon Smith: "Re: call to UV printers: was Fluorescent bulbs"
Maybe in reply to: Risa S. Horowitz: "call to UV printers: was Fluorescent bulbs"