> And then Judy says:
>
> >Then again, how about "neo-classic"?
>
You didn't say what's wrong with that term, Dick.
I'm rather taken with Ron Silver's suggestion about an entirely *new*
term, especially if something that means "past & future" in Inuit could be
made sayable & spellable.
But I also think "neo-classic" would cover the territory, signalling "same
only different," as in such terms as "neo-expressionism," etc.
Judy
----------