> The problem with the term complementary is that it places
>its emphasis elsewhere: complementary to what?
Photography, just as 'alternative photography' is alternative to everyday
photography. The osteopaths and the acupuncturists chose 'complementary' as
an alternative to 'alternative' and everybody knows what 'complementary
means in that context.
>Classical just doesn't have it. We need to be more playful!
Extending Ron's Inuit theme, I hope that it does not get labeled 'anorak'
photgraphy to distinguish it from 'suit' photography.
That would not be very complimentary.
Terry King
----------