Re: graphs

Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Mon, 24 Feb 1997 12:28:18 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ronald Connelly: "Contrasty Cyanotypes"
Previous message: Kerik Kouklis: "Re: Enlarged Neg. Service"
Maybe in reply to: red bradley: "graphs"
Next in thread: Jud Hofmann: "Re: graphs"

On Mon, 24 Feb 1997, Jodie Allen wrote: > It depends on his data and what
he intends to do. If you have a few points to > plot, then graphing by
hand is fine. However, if you have lots of data, or want > to try looking
at it using different graphical methods then the computer is a > great
improvement over hand graphing. >

Wayde, I usually plot a 21-step, from 9 to about 15 steps. Is that "lots
of data"?

Judy

Next message: Ronald Connelly: "Contrasty Cyanotypes"
Previous message: Kerik Kouklis: "Re: Enlarged Neg. Service"
Maybe in reply to: red bradley: "graphs"
Next in thread: Jud Hofmann: "Re: graphs"