I believe he meant that glyoxal has two aldehyde groups, but I don't
think that means that it is twice as reactive. I would think that
its use as a replacement for formaldehyde means that it is less
reactive in some senses (less carcinogenic, less smelly, ...).
In case anyone else is interested I found:
http://www.acdlabs.com/iupac/nomenclature/79/r79_261.htm
which is one of a whole bunch of chemistry nomenclature pages that
shows the formulas of formaldehyde and glyoxal (amoung others).
O
//
H - C
\
H
formaldehyde
and:
O O
\\ //
C - C
/ \
H H
glyoxal
Sandor Mathe -- sandor.mathe@prior.ca
(905) 670-1225 x333 -- FAX (905) 670-1344