Yes, this is true. However, there is a reasonable expectation that certain
items will last for a certain period of time. We know about the nature of
photographic images, but the average person does not. If you think everyone
understands that a specific type of image will last X number of years, you
are mistaken.
Which
probably raises the real issue: if you sell your photographs do you provide
an explicit warranty that they will last for a stated number of years? If
not, you're probably OK. No implied warranty of fitness or merchantability
extends forever. Implied warranties will be judged by their
reasonableness.
Since nobody knows how long these photographs will last, nobody can be
accused of selling a photograph that unreasonably failed to meet
expectations of longevity.
I understand that. the problem is not us, but the general public and their
perception. all I asked is if it is a god idea to state upfront with
potential customers, that there a chance that the image they buy now will
probably fade in a few years.
I would suggest to everyone that if given the chance, start photographing
cases involving product liability. You would be amazed at the problems
people cause for themselves and then expect to collect money for when their
stupidity get the better of them.
Of course, you could provide a warranty if you wanted to, but you should
put
a disclaimer on it that says the warranty applies only if the photograph is
always stored in a refrigerator without a light bulb in it.
You don't need to go that far, just make sure you are covered.
RM