Re: Communications Therory 101


Steve Shapiro (sgshiya@redshift.com)
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 20:37:38 -0800


Subject: Communications Therory 101

>While I can't argue the basics of Eugene's post, I for one have seen the
>friction that has existed on the list - clearly there was no requirement
for
>pheromone intervention or the other subtleties of body language. The
common
>thread here is ****ego**** and in case you missed it, there is a lot of it
>embedded in the posts I read.
>
>Having said that, please understand that I not posting this to upset
anyone,
>only to point out that we all could be more sensitive to others
>interpretations of the written word and to keep our personal agenda out of
>our communications.
>
>Nick
>

With that in mind, what occurs to me is how we are all producing in our own
heads, and a link directly into others' from dark little spaces as in an
electronic box; and it is reminisent of the documentary about RJ Crumb;
deconstructing his images and his message as "Raw Id."

Steve



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:44