Re: Edge Adjacency and Enlarged Negatives


Steve Shapiro (sgshiya@redshift.com)
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:08:27 -0800


Go to View Camera magazine!

S. Shapiro

-----Original Message-----
From: FotoDave@aol.com <FotoDave@aol.com>
To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
<alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Date: Thursday, January 28, 1999 3:00 PM
Subject: Edge Adjacency and Enlarged Negatives

>Within an hour after I posted the message about adjacency effect with
>"regular" developers, I already received some messages from people telling
me
>their interest and asking for my developer, time, temperature, agitation,
etc.
>It seems like I have caused some confusion (since I replied with the Tri-X
>header), so here is some explanation:
>
>My tests with D76 (and LC-1) was for developing high-contrast lith film
>(Arista APH in particular) as continous-tone film. The tests were not for
>regular film, so I don't have the results for those.
>
>I know that I can get edge-adjacency effect with "normal" developer, but I
>haven't started the tests yet, but even if I do the tests, they will also
be
>for making enlarged negatives, not for original camera negatives. I like my
>original negatives to be developed more or less "normally."
>
>Some suggest that I post my result to the list. I will, at least in a
>condensed form. The reason I mentioned about publishing in on my web site
or
>the journal or other publication was mainly due to space and length
>consideration because there might be images to be shown.
>
>
>Dave
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:47