Re: archival ink for deskjet


Gary Miller (gmphotos@earthlink.net)
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:50:25 -0800


Cor;

You can fool some of the people some of the time, etc..........

Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Cor Breukel <cor@ruly46.medfac.leidenuniv.nl>
To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
<alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Date: Friday, January 29, 1999 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: archival ink for deskjet

>On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 Bob_Maxey@mtn.3com.com wrote:
>
>> Of course you have to gaurantee that you will reprint any and all prints
>> that
>> fade after a few years in order to sell them unless of course you are
just
>> trying to make a fast buck.
>>
>>
>> Very true, but I wonder what the public's opinion would be of a product
>> that goes bad every few years. Anyone who believes that this is
acceptable
>> to the general public, needs to get out more.
>
>..this reminds me of a tv item about a graffiti artist: formaly sprying
>the NYC metro now (still? ) an "esthablished artist", his work displayed
>at Galleries. He made hughe paintings with spray canned paint, and glued
>objects (trash from the street as I remember) objects to the painting and
>sprayed these also. The point is that his work started to fade, and the
>glued objects started to drop off, the material on which he made his
>painting started to bend.
>
>This was all accepted, and explained by the 'organic' nature of the work.
>It sold for big bucks..
>
>
>
>Cor Breukel
>
>http://ruly70.medfac.leidenuniv.nl/~cor/cor.html
>"The Infrared Gallery"
>http://ruly70.medfac.leidenuniv.nl/~cor/ir-gallery.html
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:48