Re: HEY, KODAK! Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]

Michael Keller (keller@wvinter.net)
Tue, 20 Apr 1999 21:51:59 -0400

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Michael Keller: "Re: Too much equipment"
• Previous message: Michael Keller: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• In reply to: Altview@aol.com: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Next in thread: Richard Lahrson: "Re: HEY, KODAK! Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

BTW, if Kodak, Fuji, Nikon and Canon thought film was disappearing in ten
years they would not have invested the tons of money they did in the
Advanced Photo System.

• Next message: Michael Keller: "Re: Too much equipment"
• Previous message: Michael Keller: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• In reply to: Altview@aol.com: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Next in thread: Richard Lahrson: "Re: HEY, KODAK! Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:32