Re: [Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]]

Darryl Baird (dbaird@flint.umich.edu)
Wed, 21 Apr 1999 23:16:30 -0500

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Hal Faulkner: "RE: Imagesetter Output Going Away...."
• Previous message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: Imagesetter Output Going Away...."
• Maybe in reply to: Larry Watson: "Imagesetter Output Going Away...."
• Next in thread: Richard Lahrson: "Re: [Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]]"

> P.S. no one as of yet can or has answer my question on length of time these inks
> for printers will last. I have to assume therefore that I am right. Archival
> Digital Prints (oxymoron)

look at http://www.missupply.com/

I'm using these inks currently. They're advertised as archival and awaiting the Wilhelm
test results. Dan Burkholder first posted this site and I found they're just down the
highway.

Darryl

• Next message: Hal Faulkner: "RE: Imagesetter Output Going Away...."
• Previous message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: Imagesetter Output Going Away...."
• Maybe in reply to: Larry Watson: "Imagesetter Output Going Away...."
• Next in thread: Richard Lahrson: "Re: [Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]]"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:32