Re: Calibrating output (digital)

FotoDave@aol.com
Tue, 25 May 1999 01:01:29 -0400 (EDT)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Richard Knoppow: "Nelson's Gold Toner, further notes"
• Previous message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: Retraction Fw: Question about FX-2"
• Maybe in reply to: Steve Shapiro: "Retraction Fw: Question about FX-2"
• Next in thread: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: Re: Calibrating output (digital)"

In a message dated 5/24/99 9:52:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, FotoDave@AOL.COM
writes:

> It is the case where you would find one with a density of .30
> and another one has 0.35, for example.

I meant to say "it is NOT the case...."

• Next message: Richard Knoppow: "Nelson's Gold Toner, further notes"
• Previous message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: Retraction Fw: Question about FX-2"
• Maybe in reply to: Steve Shapiro: "Retraction Fw: Question about FX-2"
• Next in thread: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: Re: Calibrating output (digital)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:35