I heard Farber give a talk a couple of years ago in Santa Fe, but unlike his
images he was not as boring.
This kind of reminds of the saying. "If the nude is out of focus it's art
and if it's in focus it's porn".
If any one gets to see the newest book by James Fee, not only has both nude
men and women, he handles them both, what I see as a nonsexually way.
James
> If that's their pleasure, fine with me... I have nothing against porn
> either... I just ask for truth in labelling -- don't call it art, or a
> "neutral" art convention. It may be art, sometimes it is, but neutral it
> isn't. It's an eroticized stereotype.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 11 2000 - 12:10:48