Re: Esh-ahg /was Re: Fresson article in "Reponses Photo" of June 1999

Sandy King (sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu)
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 22:51:05 -0500

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: Esh-ahg /was Re: Fresson article in "Reponses Photo" of June 1999"
• Previous message: Joseph Arkins: "Re: Esh-ahg /was Re: Fresson article in "Reponses Photo" of June 1999"
• In reply to: Judy Seigel: "Esh-ahg /was Re: Fresson article in "Reponses Photo" of June 1999"
• Next in thread: Joseph Arkins: "Re: Esh-ahg /was Re: Fresson article in "Reponses Photo" of June 1999"

>AS a poor dyslexia englisman

>I think it is pronuonced thus,
>
>U-Shag-Way
>
>But then again I could be wrong :-->
>
>Pete
>
>Love you Judy

No, that is not it either. Echagüe is pronounced more like this:

        Eeh - chag - Way

Sandy King

• Next message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Re: Esh-ahg /was Re: Fresson article in "Reponses Photo" of June 1999"
• Previous message: Joseph Arkins: "Re: Esh-ahg /was Re: Fresson article in "Reponses Photo" of June 1999"
• In reply to: Judy Seigel: "Esh-ahg /was Re: Fresson article in "Reponses Photo" of June 1999"
• Next in thread: Joseph Arkins: "Re: Esh-ahg /was Re: Fresson article in "Reponses Photo" of June 1999"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Dec 05 1999 - 17:09:24