Re: Somerst paper


Roger Hein (rogein@sympatico.ca)
Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:53:12 -0500


> My one test of Somerset (I don't remember which variety and it could
> make a difference) was unsuccessful. It was much too absorbent, soaked
> up expensive senitizer like there was no tomorrow, and delivered blotchy
> prints. You may have a different Somerset paper, but be sure it really

I'll second Carl's comments on this paper. I too found it much too
absorbent & 'blotchy' - a far cry from Arches Platine. Not sure on the
'variety' I used but it was listed under the Fabriano catalog.

Cheers,
Roger...

-- 
Visit My Website!----->http://www3.sympatico.ca/rogein
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"It is one of the easiest things to do,
one of the most difficult to accomplish"
 ---confessions of a fictitious photographer



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Dec 05 1999 - 17:09:24