[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Buxton Papers
Judy,
> Don, I assume Mike Ware must have used Buxton for his New Cyanotype,
> because it was made with his collaboration, or at least was vetted by him,
> for his pt-pd process. And I know papers perform differently with the
> "new" and the "classic" cyano -- but my tests showed that Buxton was not
> especially good for "classic" or regular cyano ... granted the tests were
I am using the New Cyanotype and getting really miserable prints. This is
caused I beleive by:
1) My poor coating technique.
2) Negatives that aren't quite contrasty and dense for the process
3) The paper I'm using, which BTW includes Cranes #90 Natural White and
Bright White, Canson Bristol (a really inexpensive paper) and Fabriano Uno
#90 and something heavier perhaps #140.
My exposure times are running between 20 and 30 minutes and I either
underexpose or overexpose. I tried bleaching the dark prints with sodium
carbonate but end up with almost blanks highlights.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't expect Buxton to work miracles for my poor
technique but both Ware and Arentz speak highly of this paper so I wanted to
try some out *after* I started getting more consistent results.
Thanks for the input,
Don