Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Alt-Photo Monthly Reminder
  • From: holtsg@duke.usask.ca
• Scanning software
  • From: "Editor - P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
• Scanning software
  • From: "Editor - P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
• ARRRRGGGGGGHHHH!
  • From: "Editor - P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
• Cold Bath Developer - PT/PD
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: Cold Bath Developer - PT/PD
  • From: Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Cold Bath Developer - PT/PD
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Salted Paper Fog
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Salted Paper:
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Salted Paper:
  • From: Joe <jportale@gci-net.com>
• Salted Paper Sizing
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Salted Paper:
  • From: Sam Wang <stwang@mindspring.com>
• Re: Salted Paper:
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: color of VanDyke/Longevity?
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: Salted Paper:
  • From: Sarah Van Keuren <svk@steuber.com>
• Re: Salted Paper:
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Salted Paper:
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Salted Paper:
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: color of VanDyke/Longevity?
  • From: Gwen Walstrand <gwalstra@lib.drury.edu>
• Re: Salted Paper:
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Salted Paper
  • From: Randall Webb <randall.webb@lineone.net>
• Re: color of VanDyke/Longevity?
  • From: James Young <jamiehy@globaldialog.com>
• Re: color of VanDyke/Longevity?
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Alt-photo Reminder
  • From: holtsg@duke.usask.ca
• borax toner "recipe"
  • From: emily kate <mle_k8@hotmail.com>
• Re: Salted Paper Sizing
  • From: Joe <jportale@gci-net.com>
• Gum bichromate on canvas
  • From: lva <lva@pamho.net>
• color VDB or Salt paper / longevity
  • From: formic <formic@tiscalinet.it>
• Pt/Pd test results - FO culprit
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: Gum bichromate on canvas
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: Gum bichromate on canvas
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• mailing adress
  • From: Satoru Tanno <S-sato@iacnet.ne.jp>
• Salted Paper/Selenium Followup
  • From: Sarah Van Keuren <svk@steuber.com>
• Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
  • From: Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net>
• Kallitypes not recognized.
  • From: Jack Fulton <jefulton1@home.com>
• Re: Gum bichromate on canvas
  • From: lva <lva@pamho.net>
• Re: Italy/Austria
  • From: Camera Chiara <camerachiara@technet.it>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: FDanB@aol.com
• Re: Salted Paper/Selenium Followup
  • From: Steve Shapiro <sgshiya@redshift.com>
• Re: Kallitypes not recognized.
  • From: fishy <fishy@mediaone.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Ender100@aol.com
• Re: Italy/Austria
  • From: Harald Leban <hleban@1012surfnet.at>
• Enlarged negatives
  • From: Nash Computer Technology <nashcom@btinternet.com>
• Fw: Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• Re: Fw: Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• patriotic particulate matter
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Enlarged negatives
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Digital Negatives -- baby question
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives -- baby question
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Kallitypes not recognized.
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Fw: Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• RE: Kallitypes not recognized.
  • From: DC <DC@gw.tander.ru>
• Kallitype longevity
  • From: Jack Fulton <jefulton1@home.com>
• RE: Fw: Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
  • From: Bob Mazzullo <bobm@con2.com>
• Image gallery
  • From: kelekelio <gregory_7@yahoo.com>
• Re: Image gallery
  • From: Gary Miller <gmphotos@earthlink.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives -- baby question
  • From: Gary Miller <gmphotos@earthlink.net>
• new alt book coming out (?)
  • From: emily kate <mle_k8@hotmail.com>
• Buxton Papers
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: fishy <fishy@mediaone.net>
• Re: new alt book coming out (?)
  • From: Mac Legrandi <juicebox@my-Deja.com>
• Re: Kallitypes not recognized.
  • From: Steve Shapiro <sgshiya@redshift.com>
• Re: new alt book coming out (?)
  • From: James Romeo <jromeo@iopener.net>
• Re: Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
  • From: Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Enlarged negatives
  • From: Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Carl Fransman <salto@salto.be>
• Re: Digital Negatives -- baby question
  • From: Carl Fransman <salto@salto.be>
• Re: Digital Negatives -- baby question
  • From: Carl Fransman <salto@salto.be>
• Re: Digital Negatives
  • From: emily kate <mle_k8@hotmail.com>
• Re: new alt book coming out (?)
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: FDanB@aol.com
• Re: Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Dags in print
  • From: Jonathan Bailey <quryhous@midcoast.com>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• BPF200/ development?
  • From: Tom Hawkins <tomehawk@ix.netcom.com>
• Re: Digital Negatives
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• BPF
  • From: Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net>
• re. BPF
  • From: Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net>
• Re: BPF
  • From: nze christian <christian_nze@hotmail.com>
• multiple registration of negatives
  • From: Lukas Werth <lukas.werth@rz.hu-berlin.de>
• Book announcement
  • From: Jonathan Bailey <quryhous@midcoast.com>
• Re: Salted Paper:
  • From: Wisbl <isabella32@earthlink.net>
• Re: new alt book coming out (?)
  • From: àV <DENNIS@klink47.freeserve.co.uk>
• Re: multiple registration of negatives
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• Alt BBQ in Denver
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• Re: multiple registration of negatives
  • From: Andre Fuhrmann <Andre.Fuhrmann@uni-konstanz.de>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: FDanB@aol.com
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Italy/Austria
  • From: "Norman J. Ford" <njford@netvigator.com>
• Sorry
  • From: "Norman J. Ford" <njford@netvigator.com>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: FotoDave@aol.com
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Tom Ferguson <tomf2468@pipeline.com>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Denver BBQ
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• RE: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net>
• cyanotype problems
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: CCBaggett@aol.com
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: garimo <omirag@cruzio.com>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Tom Ferguson <tomf2468@pipeline.com>
• Fokos Exhibit
  • From: Rocky Boudreaux <rocky@pdq.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• rubylith
  • From: Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net>
• cyan-info-type for Don
  • From: garimo <omirag@cruzio.com>
• Re: rubylith
  • From: Sil Horwitz <silh@earthlink.net>
• Re: rubylith
  • From: FotoDave@aol.com
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: rubylith
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: rubylith
  • From: Les Newcomer <lnphoto@ismi.net>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: rubylith
  • From: FotoDave@aol.com
• Re: rubylith
  • From: Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net>
• Houston Area
  • From: Rocky Boudreaux <rocky@pdq.net>
• Re: rubylith
  • From: Gwen Walstrand <gwalstra@lib.drury.edu>
• Re: Buxton Papers
  • From: Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net>
• Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  • From: Ender100@aol.com
• Alt-photo Reminder
  • From: holtsg@duke.usask.ca
• Califronia
  • From: Fran Engelcke <fran@engelcke.com>
• Re: your mail
  • From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
• Re: your mail
  • From: Sarah Van Keuren <svk@steuber.com>
• Re: your mail -
  • From: edzachary <edzachary@my-Deja.com>
• Re: your mail -
  • From: "Gordon J. Holtslander" <holtsg@duke.usask.ca>
• Re: Visiting the show
  • From: Camera Chiara <camerachiara@technet.it>
• Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Salted Paper Toning
  • From: MIKENPHOTO@aol.com
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• RE: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Keith Gerling <kgerling@ameritech.net>
• New eMail address!
  • From: Guy Glorieux <guy.glorieux@sympatico.ca>
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Ender100@aol.com
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Ender100@aol.com
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Optimizing Negatives for Scanning
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• RE: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued - Ink Question
  • From: Keith Gerling <kgerling@ameritech.net>
• No Subject
  • From: Joshua <zhimboo@kcnet.com>
• curves for gum printing
  • From: jacques verschuren <fotjver@wxs.nl>
• RE: curves for gum printing
  • From: Keith Gerling <kgerling@ameritech.net>
• RE: curves for gum printing
  • From: Keith Gerling <kgerling@ameritech.net>
• Color analyzer vs densitometer
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Digital negs for Bromoil
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: curves for gum printing
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Craig Koshyk <chiendog@pangea.ca>
• Re: Color analyzer vs densitometer
  • From: Brian Ellis <bellis@tampabay.rr.com>
• Re: Digital negs for Bromoil
  • From: Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net>
• Re: Color analyzer vs densitometer
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Color analyzer vs densitometer
  • From: terry roth <terryroth@earthlink.net>
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: terry roth <terryroth@earthlink.net>
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Sam Wang <stwang@mindspring.com>
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>
• Drakroom tip
  • From: Witho Worms & Jorien van Santen <verzet13@xs4all.nl>
• Re: Drakroom tip
  • From: Charles Dias <charlesbronsondias@hotmail.com>
• RE: Salted Paper Toning
  • From: Keith Gerling <kgerling@ameritech.net>
• Re: Drakroom tip
  • From: Witho Worms & Jorien van Santen <verzet13@xs4all.nl>
• Re: Drakroom tip
  • From: Charles Dias <charlesbronsondias@hotmail.com>
• Re: Salted Paper Toning
  • From: MIKENPHOTO@aol.com
• densitometry Re: Salted Paper Toning
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Photo Alt Exhibition
  • From: àV <DENNIS@klink47.freeserve.co.uk>
• RE: Photo Alt Exhibition
  • From: Campos & Davis Photos <photos@campos-davis.com>
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: Photo Alt Exhibition
  • From: Joshua <zhimboo@kcnet.com>
• densitometry Re: Salted Paper Toning
  • From: Doug Munson <dmunson@albumenworks.com>
• Re: densitometry Re: Salted Paper Toning
  • From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
• ballasts
  • From: Robert Lyman <railroad@northweb.com>
• Re: ballasts
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: ballasts
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• new web page
  • From: nze christian <christian_nze@hotmail.com>
• Shared learning experience on albumen
  • From: "Richard S. Sullivan" <richsul@earthlink.net>
• Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
  • From: Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Shared learning experience on albumen
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• super-actinic bulbs
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: densitometry Re: Salted Paper Toning
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Shared learning experience on albumen
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• more on amberlith/rubylith
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: ballasts
  • From: Brian Ellis <bellis@tampabay.rr.com>
• Re: super-actinic bulbs
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Re: ballasts
  • From: Dave & Erin <dfisher@nstar.net>
• Re: super-actinic bulbs
  • From: Robert Lyman <railroad@northweb.com>
• Re: Shared learning experience on albumen
  • From: Richard Sullivan <richsul@earthlink.net>
• Re: Shared learning experience on albumen
  • From: Richard Sullivan <richsul@earthlink.net>
• Re: ballasts
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: ballasts
  • From: Roger Hein <rogein@sympatico.ca>
• Re: super-actinic bulbs
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• gaussian blur?
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: gaussian blur?
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: gaussian blur?
  • From: Sam Wang <stwang@mindspring.com>
• Re: gaussian blur?
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Bastille Day
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: gaussian blur? - Judy's Moirés
  • From: "Editor - P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
• Re: Bastille Day
  • From: "Editor - P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
• Re: gaussian blur? - Judy's Moirés
  • From: Darryl Baird <dbaird@flint.umich.edu>
• Re: gaussian blur?
  • From: Ender100@aol.com
• Re: Bastille Day
  • From: Ed Stander <glassact@compuserve.com>
• Re: gaussian blur?
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Bastille Day
  • From: Philippe Ayral <payral@club-internet.fr>
• Heliograph process
  • From: Sam Wang <stwang@mindspring.com>
• Re: Bastille Day
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: Bastille Day
  • From: Edward Meyers <aghalide@panix.com>
• you haven't expired
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Heliograph process
  • From: James Romeo <jromeo@iopener.net>
• Re: super-actinic bulbs
  • From: Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
• Alt-photo Reminder
  • From: holtsg@duke.usask.ca
• Re: Heliograph process
  • From: Richard Morris <richard.morris@brunel.ac.uk>
• PMK times/temp.
  • From: e n <emanmb@yahoo.com>
• Re: PMK times/temp.
  • From: Jason Hall <JASON@jbhall.freeserve.co.uk>
• Re: PMK times/temp.
  • From: BKPhoto@aol.com
• Re: PMK times/temp.
  • From: Jason Hall <JASON@jbhall.freeserve.co.uk>
• Re: PMK times/temp.
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work
  • From: Peter McDonald <Peter.McDonald@afp.gov.au>
• Re: GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work
  • From: Sam Wang <stwang@mindspring.com>
• OT: Advice on archival spray adhesive
  • From: Mac Legrandi <juicebox@my-Deja.com>
• Re: Optimizing Negatives for Scanning
  • From: Ender100@aol.com
• Re: GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• Re: Optimizing Negatives for Scanning
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Photo BBQ, 7/23
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• Re: GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work
  • From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
• Re: [lug] Re: GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work (fwd)
  • From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
• Re: [lug] Re: GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work (fwd)
  • From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
• Re: [lug] Re: GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work (fwd)
  • From: Gregory Parkinson <glp@panix.com>
• Re: [lug] Re: GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work (fwd)
  • From: "Editor - P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
• Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Andre Fuhrmann <Andre.Fuhrmann@uni-konstanz.de>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Robert Lyman <railroad@northweb.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Andre Fuhrmann <Andre.Fuhrmann@uni-konstanz.de>
• Re: [lug] Re: GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work (fwd)
  • From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Sam Wang <stwang@mindspring.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Bob Kiss <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
• Re: [lug] Re: GIMP: is CMYK imprtant for monochrome work (fwd)
  • From: Gregory Parkinson <glp@panix.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• RE: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: "Vrueh, G.J. de" <G.J.de.Vrueh@pve.agro.nl>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: walt goettman <wgoettman@mm.wyeth.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Sam Wang <stwang@mindspring.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: walt goettman <wgoettman@mm.wyeth.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Gregory Parkinson <glp@panix.com>
• Multiple Colored Desktop Negatives
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• The Formulary's Carbon Printing Workshop
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Multiple Colored Desktop Negatives
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• What is a Van Dyke? Kallitype?
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: What is a Van Dyke? Kallitype?
  • From: Darlington Media Group <postmaster@mediaworkshop.demon.co.uk>
• giant photogram Q
  • From: emily kate <mle_k8@hotmail.com>
• Re: What is a Van Dyke? Kallitype?
  • From: fishy <fishy@mediaone.net>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: giant photogram Q
  • From: dean kansky <dkansky@hotmail.com>
• Argyrotype
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: Sil Horwitz <silh@earthlink.net>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: garimo <omirag@cruzio.com>
• Re: giant photogram Q
  • From: YAPAR@aol.com
• Alt-photo Reminder
  • From: holtsg@duke.usask.ca
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test) (becoming OT)
  • From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>
• non-silver photogram? or silver b/w paper?
  • From: emily kate <mle_k8@hotmail.com>
• Re: non-silver photogram? or silver b/w paper?
  • From: Brian Ellis <bellis@tampabay.rr.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test)
  • From: efeinsod <feinsod@blast.net>
• A FEW ITEMS
  • From: Bob Kiss <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
• Re: non-silver photogram? or silver b/w paper?
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• SOLVENT FOR WAX
  • From: Bob Kiss <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: Darlington Media Group <postmaster@mediaworkshop.demon.co.uk>
• Removing pyro stains
  • From: "David J. Romano" <romano@agfa.com>
• Darkroom Bamboo Print tongs - reviving
  • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Know a good source for 1/8 " glass?
  • From: bauld@micron.net
• Re: Know a good source for 1/8 " glass?
  • From: garimo <omirag@cruzio.com>
• RE: Know a good source for 1/8 " glass?
  • From: ken Watson <watsok@frii.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test) (becoming OT)
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Permanency of VDB (test) (becoming OT)
  • From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>
• Re: Darkroom Bamboo Print tongs - reviving
  • From: Sil Horwitz <silh@earthlink.net>
• RE: Permanency of VDB (test) (becoming OT)
  • From: Rick Moore <rickm@gethen.com>
• Re: Plastidip
  • From: Les Newcomer <lnphoto@ismi.net>
• Sources for Paper
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Selenium
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Sources for Paper
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• Re: Sources for Paper
  • From: Sil Horwitz <silh@earthlink.net>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
• Re: Know a good source for 1/8 " glass?
  • From: Doug Munson <dmunson@albumenworks.com>
• Re: giant photogram Q
  • From: YAPAR@aol.com
• brown ferric ammonium citrate
  • From: Istvan Bibo <bibo969@hotmail.com>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Cor Breukel <cor@lumc.nl>
• Re: brown ferric ammonium citrate
  • From: nze christian <christian_nze@hotmail.com>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>
• Re: brown ferric ammonium citrate
  • From: Istvan Bibo <bibo969@hotmail.com>
• 3 ways of conserving
  • From: Sarah Van Keuren <svk@steuber.com>
• outdated paper
  • From: Carl Weese <cweese@earthlink.net>
• Cyanotype site
  • From: Malin Hylen <malinhylen@hotbot.com>
• Re: brown ferric ammonium citrate
  • From: nze christian <christian_nze@hotmail.com>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Wisbl <isabella32@earthlink.net>
• Re: Sources for Paper
  • From: John Richardson <jrplatinum@earthlink.net>
• RE: Selenium
  • From: Rick Moore <rickm@gethen.com>
• Re: Sources for Paper
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: outdated paper
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: brown ferric ammonium citrate
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: outdated paper
  • From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
• end of an era (fwd)
  • From: Greg Schmitz <gws1@columbia.edu>
• Re: Sources for Paper
  • From: Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Sources for Paper
  • From: DFStein@aol.com
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Richard Maddox <slow_emulsions@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: Sources for Paper
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Sources for Paper
  • From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
• Re: Sources for Paper
  • From: Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Sil Horwitz <silh@earthlink.net>
• Re: Selenium
  • From: Cor Breukel <cor@lumc.nl>
• Ammonia based chemistry
  • From: Witho Worms & Jorien van Santen <verzet13@xs4all.nl>
• alt processes on barited paper
  • From: Istvan Bibo <bibo969@hotmail.com>
• Re: Ammonia based chemistry
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Introductory teaching materials
  • From: erobkin@uwc.edu
• Re: Introductory teaching materials
  • From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
• Re: Ammonia based chemistry
  • From: Witho Worms en Jorien van Santen <verzet13@xs4all.nl>
• Re: Introductory teaching materials
  • From: Jenfieldny@aol.com
• Argyrotype
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Introductory teaching materials
  • From: photography <photography@rlett.fsnet.co.uk>
• Re: Photo Alt Exhibition
  • From: àV <DENNIS@klink47.freeserve.co.uk>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: nze christian <christian_nze@hotmail.com>
• Intro Teaching Materials
  • From: "Robert W. Schramm" <schrammrus@hotmail.com>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: Liam Lawless <lawless@ic24.net>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: nze christian <christian_nze@hotmail.com>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• abc+ pyro, t-max100
  • From: Tom Hawkins <tomehawk@ix.netcom.com>
• Re: Introductory teaching materials
  • From: Sarah Van Keuren <svk@steuber.com>
• PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: Bob Kiss <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
• Re: PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: Introductory teaching materials
  • From: Sam Wang <stwang@mindspring.com>
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: fishy <fishy@mediaone.net>
• Re: abc+ pyro, t-max100
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Alt-photo Reminder
  • From: holtsg@duke.usask.ca
• Re: Argyrotype
  • From: nze christian <christian_nze@hotmail.com>
• Argyrotype my experience and questions
  • From: "Vrueh, G.J. de" <G.J.de.Vrueh@pve.agro.nl>
• Re: Argyrotype my experience and questions
  • From: nze christian <christian_nze@hotmail.com>
• RE: Argyrotype my experience and questions
  • From: "Vrueh, G.J. de" <G.J.de.Vrueh@pve.agro.nl>
• PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: Bob Kiss <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
• Re: PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: Randall Webb <randall.webb@lineone.net>
• Re: PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• RE: PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: "Jim Ford (S3)" <JFord@s3.com>
• RE: PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: Keith Gerling <kgerling@ameritech.net>
• RE: Argyrotype my experience and questions
  • From: nze christian <christian_nze@hotmail.com>
• Re: PIGMENT PRINTS/ another poor thing who can't unsubscribe
  • From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>
• Re: PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: wgoettman@mm.wyeth.com
• Re: PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: Gerard NIEMETZKY <gerard@atxstudio.com>
• No Subject
  • From: Marcelina Martin <twoskies@mediaone.net>
• Re: PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: wgoettman@mm.wyeth.com
• Re: PIGMENT PRINTS
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
• Re: UV lights vs Black lights
  • From: Jenfieldny@aol.com
• UV lights vs Black lights: this might be a repeat
  • From: Jenfieldny@aol.com
• Re: Sarah Moon's Pigment Prints
  • From: Tod Gangler <artandsoul@mindspring.com>
• What film for enlarged negs
  • From: MIKENPHOTO@aol.com
• Icefields?
  • From: Richard <richard999@ozemail.com.au>
• Re: Icefields?
  • From: john <attisiii@home.com>
• Re: Icefields?
  • From: Ralph Rinke <rrphotog@intergate.bc.ca>
• Digital Negs - Canada source
  • From: George Huczek <ghuczek@sk.sympatico.ca>
• Digital Negatives
  • From: julio and imelda <galata@nova.net.mx>
• Re: Digital Negatives
  • From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Re: UV lights vs Black lights
  • From: Garet Denise <garet@rmi.net>
• Kodak Duraclear
  • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>