[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd

To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 09:00:23 -0700
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000707104314.23558D-100000@tigger.boulder.nist.gov><39671111.652B15E3@worldnet.att.net> <014201bfe8e1$a7703ea0$bdeab094@new><000b01bfe8ee$3e22ed00$111fd1d1@Nick> <39674E38.EF96BFC3@worldnet.att.net>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

You win.......................


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jeffrey D. Mathias <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd


> Nick Makris wrote:
> > 
> > Maybe we should put an end to this one.
> 
> Man, you got that right.
>

References:
- Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  - From: Wayde Allen <wallen@boulder.nist.gov>
- Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  - From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
- Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  - From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>
- Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  - From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
- Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
  - From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
Next by Date: rubylith
Prev by thread: Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
Next by thread: RE: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread