From: Bill Collins (photo@intrex.net)
Date: 06/21/00-05:49:49 AM Z
I thought the biggest problem with old film was fog. In that case, increased development is NOT the thing to do.
Bill
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Editor - P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 23:08:54 -0400
>Go with Norm's advice on times (plus maybe +50 and +100% developing time
>for the aging and hope you get something) and do a "short" clip test
>split between the two times..... Then develop accordingly based on what
>the negs look like...
>
>It's not going to be exact anyway, between the aging and not knowing
>what speed the film was shot at...
>
>Better to chance losing a frame or three than a whole roll...
>
>Finally, the doubled development time should let you know if there is
>ANYTHING on the roll.. No guarantees tho..
>
>Keith
>
>
>--
>{ The views expressed in the preceding are those of the }
>{ author, alone, and are neither the responsibility of, }
>{ nor, should they be understood to represent the }
>{ official viewpoint of P.O.V. Image Service. }
> (Persistence of Vision Image Service)
> "Your link to outstanding imagery."
> http://www.p-o-v-image.com/
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 07/14/00-09:46:45 AM Z CST