Re: Hypo Eliminators (was: Dichromate and the plate)

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Hypo Eliminators (was: Dichromate and the plate)
• From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:33:39 -0500 (EST)
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20000326135006.00ce1480@mail.earthlink.net>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

 

On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Sil Horwitz wrote:
> 
> Don't confuse "Hypo Eliminators" with "Wash Accellerators." Kodak now 
> specifically proscribes the HE series, noting they are harmful for 
               ^^^^^^^^^^

And permit me to add, for benefit of English as a 2nd or 3rd or 4th !!!
language colleagues (sigh) -- "proscribes" is opposite of "prescribes,"
that is, it means forbids.

But Sil, aren't you going to tell us anything at all about what
dichromates do if left in the print -- a little or a lot?  Any ideas?

Judy

• References:
  • Re: Hypo Eliminators (was: Dichromate and the plate)
    • From: Sil Horwitz <silh@earthlink.net>

• Prev by Date: Re: Dichromate and the plate
• Next by Date: Re: Hypo Eliminators (was: Dichromate and the plate)
• Prev by thread: Re: Hypo Eliminators (was: Dichromate and the plate)
• Next by thread: Re: Hypo Eliminators (was: Dichromate and the plate)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread