From: WLINNE (isabella32@earthlink.net)
Date: 05/14/00-05:31:31 AM Z
Received: from localhost (localhost) by snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with internal id QAA25083; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 16:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@earthlink.net>
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
To: <isabella32@earthlink.net>
Message-id: <200005142330.QAA25083@snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Auto-submitted: auto-generated (failure)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/report;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_CSuyh1b7vccZacirgjel0A)"; report-type=delivery-status
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
--Boundary_(ID_CSuyh1b7vccZacirgjel0A)
The original message was received at Sun, 14 May 2000 16:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
from dialup-63.208.134.109.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net [63.208.134.109]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<alt.photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to skyway.usask.ca.:
>>> RCPT To:<alt.photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
<<< 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal user: alt.photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
550 <alt.photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>... User unknown
--Boundary_(ID_CSuyh1b7vccZacirgjel0A)
Content-type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net
Received-From-MTA: DNS; dialup-63.208.134.109.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net
Arrival-Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 16:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; alt.photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; skyway.usask.ca
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal user: alt.photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 16:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
--Boundary_(ID_CSuyh1b7vccZacirgjel0A)
Content-type: message/rfc822
Received: from user
(dialup-63.208.134.109.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net [63.208.134.109])
by snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA24995 for
<alt.photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 04:27:45 -0700
From: WLINNE <isabella32@earthlink.net>
Subject: Gold toners
To: alt.photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
Reply-to: isabella32@earthlink.net
Message-id: <391E8DB1.16D2@earthlink.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-NSCP (Win95; U)
Content-type: message/rfc822
Received: from localhost (localhost) by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with internal id QAA25711; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 16:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@earthlink.net>
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
To: <isabella32@earthlink.net>
Message-id: <200005142316.QAA25711@hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Auto-submitted: auto-generated (failure)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/report;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_2zRkVLPc8IUvNXFo0QUCXw)"; report-type=delivery-status
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
--Boundary_(ID_2zRkVLPc8IUvNXFo0QUCXw)
The original message was received at Sun, 14 May 2000 16:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
from dialup-63.208.134.109.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net [63.208.134.109]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<alt-photo-process@skyway.usask.ca>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to skyway.usask.ca.:
>>> RCPT To:<alt-photo-process@skyway.usask.ca>
<<< 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal user: alt-photo-process@skyway.usask.ca
550 <alt-photo-process@skyway.usask.ca>... User unknown
--Boundary_(ID_2zRkVLPc8IUvNXFo0QUCXw)
Content-type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net
Received-From-MTA: DNS; dialup-63.208.134.109.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net
Arrival-Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 16:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; alt-photo-process@skyway.usask.ca
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; skyway.usask.ca
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal user: alt-photo-process@skyway.usask.ca
Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 16:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
--Boundary_(ID_2zRkVLPc8IUvNXFo0QUCXw)
Content-type: message/rfc822
Received: from user
(dialup-63.208.134.109.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net [63.208.134.109])
by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA25664 for
<alt-photo-process@skyway.usask.ca>; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 04:15:19 -0700
From: WLINNE <isabella32@earthlink.net>
Subject: Gold Toners
To: alt-photo-process@skyway.usask.ca
Reply-to: isabella32@earthlink.net
Message-id: <391E8AC7.385F@earthlink.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-NSCP (Win95; U)
Content-type: message/rfc822
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 04:13:42 -0700
From: WLINNE <isabella32@earthlink.net>
Subject: Gold Toners
To: jfulton@itsa.ucsf.edu
Reply-to: isabella32@earthlink.net
Message-id: <391E8A66.420F@earthlink.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-NSCP (Win95; U)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <20000501175700.93194.qmail@hotmail.com>
<l03130302b540db7150b9@[194.222.193.134]> <391B4F9F.FC9B11E@itsa.ucsf.edu>
Hello All,
I recently purchased a fair amount of gold chloride (25g),mainly for
gold toning pop prints. I bought it from Englehard, on recommendations
from others on this list, and I was surprised how rude the gentleman I
spoke with was. First, he didn't want to sell it to me and tried to
refer me to a different company that charged three times as much, and
then acted like he was doing me a huge favor by selling me such a small
amount. He implied that he wouldn't do so again. Anyway, I am interested
in trying some gold toning for warm tones on GSP's. Has anyone tried
Nelson's gold toner or other formulas for this effect? What is the
difference between a gold-toned print and one made using, say, Kodak
brown toner or Polytoner? I would be interested in any input before I
commit to using up gold.
thanks in advance,
William
--Boundary_(ID_2zRkVLPc8IUvNXFo0QUCXw)--
--Boundary_(ID_CSuyh1b7vccZacirgjel0A)--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06/13/00-03:10:19 PM Z CST