From: Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Date: 05/15/00-01:38:37 PM Z
On Sun, 14 May 2000, Richard Knoppow wrote:
> I think that the conclusion that the discussion must be boring to others
> is based on the existence of our disagreement rather than anything else.
Hope I'm not out of line by commenting that the purpose of this list isn't
entertainment, & nobody is *obliged* to be amusing. Whoever is bored by a
topic isn't compelled to follow it. Certainly a difference of opinion has
its own rewards, not least, in this case, noting how very knowledgeable
some subscribers are in some seemingly fine points. Awesome --even without
the (relatively mild) dudgeon.
Judy
.................................................................
| Judy Seigel, Editor >
| World Journal of Post-Factory Photography > "HOW-TO and WHY"
| info@post-factory.org >
| <http://rmp.opusis.com/postfactory/postfactory.html>
.................................................................
> As far as mentioning Tintype, the term ferrotype to mean producing a
> glazed surface is pretty much an American practice, its called glazing
> elswhere. Why did you bother to attack this unless you just want to attack
> anything I say?
> ----
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles,Ca.
> dickburk@ix.netcom.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06/13/00-03:10:19 PM Z CST