From: Judy Seigel (jseigel@panix.com)
Date: 11/20/00-01:58:19 PM Z
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Liam Lawless wrote:
> Istvan,
>
> I haven't yet heard from Judy about posting the reversal method on a
> website, but there is no reason why you shouldn't use a staining developer
Sorry I've been heads down on this one (fortunately I don't have to cook
turkey for 18 *every* week), expect we'll get it going soon ... I
understand Wayde has offered hospitality of his site, which would be
perfect. And further on the bright side.... Liam's method figures to be
good indefinitely (or what today looks like indefinitely) because that
film is used for digital negs...
Liam found, incidentally, that the cheaper film, the Freestyle APH, worked
as well as, if not better than the more expensive APHS.
Judy
.................................................................
| Judy Seigel, Editor >
| World Journal of Post-Factory Photography > "HOW-TO and WHY"
| info@post-factory.org >
| <http://rmp.opusis.com/postfactory/postfactory.html>
.................................................................
> for the redevelopment stage. Developers with a high sulphite contnt should
> NOT be used for redeveloping since sulphite is a silver halide solvent, but
> sulphite is minimal in staining pyro developers.
>
>
>
> Liam
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/01/00-11:46:57 AM Z CST