[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BIG
Are you saying that abstraction was not an attempt to portray a reality?
Pam
Rod Fleming wrote:
>...
>
> The true birth of abstraction (as far as Western art is concerned) was in
> the early part of the 20thC when Cubism was developed by Picasso and Braque.
> But photography was pioneered in the first third of the 19thC and was
> widespread by 1850. That is over half a century before abstraction appeared.
> What were these painters who had been "liberated by photography" doing all
> those years? Figuring out the exposure?
>
> In fact the effect of photography was to make painters try to depict reality
> more accurately, not to break away from the depiction of it.
>
> The notion of a simple causal link between the introduction of photography
> and the development of abstraction is debunked by that _two generation_ gap
> between the two events, and no amount of "semantics" by the supporters of
> Greenberg can change that. We have to look elsewhere to find the roots of
> abstraction.
>
> Rod
--
Pamela G. Niedermayer
Pinehill Softworks Inc.
600 W. 28th St., Suite 103
Austin, TX 78705
512-236-1677
512-236-8143 fax
http://www.pinehill.com
- References:
- Re: BIG
- From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
- Re: BIG
- From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>