[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What is pee oh are en?

Why imagine that! Them dumb hicks in UTAH actually did something that those
smart people in NEW YORK CITY would have done. How amazing that people
outside of NEW YORK CITY occasionally think right  (i.e. think the same way
people in NEW YORK CITY think).

----- Original Message -----
From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: What is pee oh are en?


>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Gregory Parkinson wrote:
>
> > There's an intersting article in today's (Monday's) NY Times
> > on how the major players in the $10Billion porn industry are
> > General Motors, AT&T, and News Corp.
>
> Greg, don't know if we're talking about the same article (I read the paper
> this AM in haste) but to me MOST relelvant to this discussion article in
> today's Times was the one about the video store owner in UTAH (UTAH!!!)
> thought he was ruined because he had a few porn videos in the back of his
> store, was indicted & brought to trial for purveying porn... His lawyer
> looking out the window at big hotel across the street had a brainstorm --
> checked how many porn videos were available there on TV, pay for view,
> cable, HBO, etc... Turned out MANY, far more & raunchier than the store,
> and widely used -- in UTAH.
>
> The jury found not guilty (in UTAH !!) in about 7 minutes.
>
> Other comments:
>
> 1. The sexiest photographs I've ever seen were people with clothes on. One
> of the naughtiest was a small cabinet photo from Larry Gottheim's auction
> catalog, "Be-Hold #32" (as described in P-F #5), all the more erotic
> because "action" was clear, yet details left to the imagination.
>
> 2. Gary seems more certain about "the purpose of art" than any of the
> hotshot critics & theoreticians I've read lately.  What he cites so
> confidently is a current (and currently receding) concept. Among multiple
> variations of "purpose of art" through history have been celebration,
> decoration, record, status, narrative, exploration, illustration, uplift,
> ideal form,  etc. etc. etc.
>
> 3. If Gary could only get Henry Hyde on his tail, he'd be one lucky fella.
> Hyde *made* careers for Jock Sturges and Karen Finlay, among several other
> lacklustre and listless folks who owe glorious careers to the
> indefatiguable senator. Sturges & Finlay, for instance, had both been
> around and going nowhere much pre-Hyde, definitely small time.
> (Mapplethorpe IMO didn't need HH. He was brilliant.)
>
> best,
>
> Judy
>
>