[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What is pee oh are en?



           And the Lord said

"Let him without sin cast the first stone".

The End?

Mark.



----- Original Message -----
From: <Jenfieldny@aol.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: What is pee oh are en?


>
> In a message dated 10/24/00 5:51:18 PM, pam_pine@cape.com writes:
>
> << I'd suggest that those who have had extramarital affairs should excuse
> themselves from judging others who've been so accused. This advice if
> followed,
> of course, would have precluded Congress from meeting a quorum call. And I
do
> understand all the ins and outs of the difference between being accused of
> lying
> under oath and having an affair. If I choose to summarize Hyde's
participation
> in what's intended to be a somewhat humorous way, that's my choice. Who
can
> take
> these people seriously? I just want them out of my life, an apparently
> impossible goal.  unfortuantely, they are the only ones that will stand up
to
> the idiotic way we seem to vote people into office
>
> I'd also suggest that you drop into name calling a little too hastily and
with
> incomplete knowledge. You may want to rethink the position that just
because
> someone may or may not have paid attention to the impeachment proceedings
> (talk
> about a major time waster, right up there with OJ), s/he is a yokel.
agree
> 100%!!!  boring!! boring!!! boring!!
>  >>
> And Judy blurts, "he had a problem.  Either financial abuse or peophilia."
> > PEDOPHILIA???!!!  Judy, you should be ashamed.  His "problem" was an
affair
> > he had with a married woman thirty years ago.  i would say it is a
> "problem" when you are accusing others - otherwise it is no one's business
> what people do behind closed doors, now is it!
> Jill
>