[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is pee oh are en?
In a message dated 10/24/00 5:51:18 PM, pam_pine@cape.com writes:
<< I'd suggest that those who have had extramarital affairs should excuse
themselves from judging others who've been so accused. This advice if
followed,
of course, would have precluded Congress from meeting a quorum call. And I do
understand all the ins and outs of the difference between being accused of
lying
under oath and having an affair. If I choose to summarize Hyde's participation
in what's intended to be a somewhat humorous way, that's my choice. Who can
take
these people seriously? I just want them out of my life, an apparently
impossible goal. unfortuantely, they are the only ones that will stand up to
the idiotic way we seem to vote people into office
I'd also suggest that you drop into name calling a little too hastily and with
incomplete knowledge. You may want to rethink the position that just because
someone may or may not have paid attention to the impeachment proceedings
(talk
about a major time waster, right up there with OJ), s/he is a yokel. agree
100%!!! boring!! boring!!! boring!!
>>
And Judy blurts, "he had a problem. Either financial abuse or peophilia."
> PEDOPHILIA???!!! Judy, you should be ashamed. His "problem" was an affair
> he had with a married woman thirty years ago. i would say it is a
"problem" when you are accusing others - otherwise it is no one's business
what people do behind closed doors, now is it!
Jill