From: James Romeo (jamesromeo@mac.com)
Date: 09/25/00-09:25:18 AM Z
I used to use 5x7 trix-x but Kodak over charges I now use 5x7 ilford much
better price and I now use HP5 + for 35,120 4x6 8x10 and 5x7 the 5x7 is only
$25.00 for 25 sheets that would be $50.00 for 100 sheets that is 1/2 the
Kodak price.
In my young days Kodak was great. Now they over charge on things they want
to dump.
Even copy film and litho you can do much better. I do a lot of 5x7 and
Ilford I can buy
James
> From: Steve Shapiro <sgshiya@redshift.com>
> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 21:31:14 -0700
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Kodak to reintroduce Super-XX and....5X7 Tri-X
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <FDanB@aol.com>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
> Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 5:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Kodak to reintroduce Super-XX and....5X7 Tri-X
>
>
>>
>>
>> You said in your message...
>>
>>> Has anyone actually seen
>>> anything to suggest it is anything other than Internet rumour?
>>
>> I just returned from teaching a workshop in which one of the students was
>> a technical rep for Kodak. She was kind enough to call the person who
>> actually MAKES the decisions about which products come to market.
>> According to him, there is no chance of a Super XX return.
>>
>> Hope this puts the issue to rest and sorry to report that such a fine
>> emulsion is extinct for good.
>>
>> On the other hand, Tri-X will be available in 5X7 sheets.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
> I use TriX in 5X7 sheets, already. 50 Sheet Box @ $120
>
> S. Shapiro
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 10/01/00-12:09:00 PM Z CDT