Re: development for alt-process

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: development for alt-process
• From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:46:52 -0400
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• References: <v01520d01b6fb6bb64795@[209.144.25.201]>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

shannon stoney wrote:
> I am still working on figuring out a development time for negatives for
> cyanotypes and palladium.  

I just finished an update to my information on simultaneous exposure and
development control in my guide.  Is there any reason why you cannot
figure this out when provided with a step-by-step procedure to do so? 
Do you not have access to the internet to read my guide?

How can one be truly serious about the use of a photographic process, if
they will not break away from pursuit of some "magic" number?

Shannon, if you truly wish to learn, then learn.  I really feel people
would be providing you a disservice to spoon feed you any more
development times.

-- 
Jeffrey D. Mathias
http://home.att.net/~jeffrey.d.mathias/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: development for alt-process
    • From: Richard Sullivan FRPS <richsul@earthlink.net>

• References:
  • development for alt-process
    • From: sstoney@pdq.net (shannon stoney)

• Prev by Date: development for alt-process
• Next by Date: Re: development for alt-process
• Prev by thread: development for alt-process
• Next by thread: Re: development for alt-process
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread