Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
• From: Luc Novovitch <luc@overland.net>
• Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:28:49 -0500
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <v01520d01b7011b37adc6@[209.223.24.231]>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022

on 4/16/01 5:02 PM, shannon stoney at sstoney@pdq.net wrote:

> alt-process, and I have come to the conclusion that most of the negatives I
> made over the past year are over-exposed for those processes.  That is, I
> thought my film speed was 320 for alt-process as for silver,  and it's
> probably really closer to 400.  So, all the shadow areas are over-exposed.
> But I would like to salvage these negatives if I could

"Salvage" !? What are you talking about? Between 320 asa and 400 asa? taking
in account the variations due to metering, accuracy of the shutter speed,
etc... your shadows, if over-exposed, would be over-exposed by a 1/4 of a
stop or so. 
/ln
-- 
mailto:luc@overland.net
http://www.sotolgallery.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
    • From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>

• References:
  • a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
    • From: sstoney@pdq.net (shannon stoney)

• Prev by Date: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
• Next by Date: Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
• Prev by thread: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
• Next by thread: Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread