Re: Re: RE: Digital negatives for gum printing

[Smieglitz@aol.com]

In a message dated 08/03/2001 22:27:00, smieglitz@aol.com wrote:

<<The printer costs 
$250 and while the original inkset will cost a couple times that figure, it 
is certainly worth it for doing archival quadtone prints without even 
considering its functionality in making negatives for gum printing. >>

That should read "the Cone piezography software and the original inkset with 
a continuous ink supply (CIS) setup will cost a couple times that figure.."

Regular ink cartridges are available and much less expensive.  But, in the 
long run, the CIS is much more cost effective.

<<The quadtones are like Platinum mixed with french 
vanilla ice cream...>>

and the above should read:

"The quadtones are like Platinum mixed with french 
vanilla ice cream and a great big dollup of chocolate fudge and pistachios 
with a cherry on top."

Sorry for the omissions.

Joe