[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: size matters

To: tomehawk@ix.netcom.com
Subject: RE: size matters
From: Sandy King <sanking@CLEMSON.EDU>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:48:29 -0400
Cc: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <000b01c11eb4$2bf35b40$0400a8c0@ix.netcom.com>
References: <000b01c11eb4$2bf35b40$0400a8c0@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

Tom Hawkins wrote:

>
>
>My point, I suppose, is : print at a size that suits the image.  And if
>you're printing at a size that you think suits the market, well, that's a
>compromise that I'm just not willing to make.  To each his/her own...
>
>I write this as a viewer who was totally blown away by a 4 x6 foot
>cibachrome architectural study I saw at a show last weekend...
>

How does one determine what size suits the image? Is this for you a 
purely subjective decision based on your personal aesthetics, or a 
more objective consideration based on some specific criteria?

Sandy King

--

References:
- RE: size matters
  - From: Tom Hawkins <tomehawk@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why cat litter ??? Re: Why sawdust?
Next by Date: Re: acid bath for cyanotype
Prev by thread: Re: size matters
Next by thread: Re: size matters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread