From: zby (zby@eudoramail.com)
Date: 12/11/01-08:51:57 PM Z
>light has no "choice" but to obey the laws of physics, that
>includes the inverse square law. Light is not magic, it can and must be
>described in a rational way.
I am puzzled by the explanation why the square inversion law should not
apply for the bank of lights, and I'm too not convinced that this is
true, but on the other hand light IS magic. Funny things happen to it
(although on a different scale). If you are curious and have a moment to
spare please read a very short book by Richard Feynman: "QED - The
Strange Theory of Light and Matter".
Have fun.
Ben
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 01/02/02-04:47:33 PM Z CST