From: clay (wcharmon@wt.net)
Date: 12/31/01-10:26:14 AM Z
Witho:
I was put together with a few other orders by Fred Newman at the View Camera
Store (www.viewcamerastore.com) to get enough critical mass to make the
minimum order requirement by Kodak. I ended up having to order about 16
boxes of 10 sheets. My wife shakes her head every time she looks in the
freezer.
Clay
----------
>From: Witho Worms en Jorien van Santen <verzet13@xs4all.nl>
>To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>Subject: Re: Stain Redux - Pyrocat HD and Tri-X: was Double Dipping
>Date: Mon, Dec 31, 2001, 8:51 AM
>
>Clay or others, I like to know were or how you order your special cut TX
>material. I would like to have TX in 11x14.
>And what is the formula for Pyrocat HD with metol. I only know the phenidone
>type.
>
>Regards,
>
>Witho
>
>
>And for all a good 2002 !
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "clay" <wcharmon@wt.net>
>To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
>Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 2:54 PM
>Subject: Re: Stain Redux - Pyrocat HD and Tri-X: was Double Dipping
>
>
>> Sandy:
>>
>> The solution I have been using I mixed about 2 months ago. I developed a
>> bunch of HP-5 and Tmax400 negatives at the same time, though, and the
>> results were fine, with only proportional image stain. So I don't think
>the
>> solution is bad. To be fair, this is a new batch of Tri-X that was special
>> ordered in 7x17 size, and this was the first set of negatives developed
>from
>> this batch. I suppose it is possible that the great yellow father has
>> somehow messed up this batch. I am going to shoot some more with this film
>> and develop some negatives in both Rollo and D-76 to see if there is a
>> problem with the film. I sure hope it is not the film. The thought of
>trying
>> to return 15 boxes sounds like a royal pain in the glutes.
>>
>> BTW, the negatives were still usable. I just needed about a 25% increase
>in
>> exposure.
>>
>> Clay
>>
>>
>> ----------
>> >From: Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu>
>> >To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>> >Subject: Re: Stain Redux - Pyrocat HD and Tri-X: was Double Dipping
>> >Date: Mon, Dec 31, 2001, 1:30 AM
>> >
>>
>> >Clay,
>> >
>> >I did not see your original message regarding the fog+ stain you got
>> >on the border areas when using Pyrocat with TRI-X. The first thing
>> >that pops into my mind is to ask about the age of your stock solution
>> >of Pyrocat? I mention this because the shelf life of Pyrocat, when
>> >mixed with phenidone, is probably no greater than about three months.
>> >When the Pyrocat stock solution goes bad the result is a lot of extra
>> >base stain, somewhat irregular - even splotchy- and very observable
>> >on the clear edges of the film.
>> >
>> >
>> >With TRI-X developed in fresh Pyrocat I have not observed elevated
>> >overall stain levels or excessive general fog.
>> >
>> >Sandy King
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 01/02/02-04:47:33 PM Z CST