FW: NY Times review of "Photography: Processes, Preservation and Conservation" exhibit

From: James Romeo (jamesromeo@mac.com)
Date: 02/10/01-08:59:37 AM Z

• Next message: Nelson Goforth: "Re: GAFFER'S tape, Re: preshrink was register p/negs"
• Previous message: Carl Weese: "Re: Stieglitz exhibit at the National Gallery"
• In reply to: Gregg Kemp: "NY Times review of "Photography: Processes, Preservation and Conservation" exhibit"
• Next in thread: KEMAL DELIC: "Lightfast or archival?"
• Reply: KEMAL DELIC: "Lightfast or archival?"

 
new at the met.

 http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/10/arts/10PRIN.html

• Next message: Nelson Goforth: "Re: GAFFER'S tape, Re: preshrink was register p/negs"
• Previous message: Carl Weese: "Re: Stieglitz exhibit at the National Gallery"
• In reply to: Gregg Kemp: "NY Times review of "Photography: Processes, Preservation and Conservation" exhibit"
• Next in thread: KEMAL DELIC: "Lightfast or archival?"
• Reply: KEMAL DELIC: "Lightfast or archival?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/06/01-04:55:38 PM Z CST