From: James Romeo (jamesromeo@mac.com)
Date: 02/14/01-04:35:12 PM Z
I did not wax the negs. the printer I used was a Canon Bic 3000 and the
scanner a Umax Austra 2200. Not top of the line. Not the best prints I ever
made but what I got gives me hope. They are geting great top of the line
digital at the museum. so if I ever learn what I am doing I can do some of
my work there.
I have ben in pain from a accident I had last fall I am feeling better and I
hope to do some more work on this. To br able to make digital negs would be
great.
James
> From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 01:07:49 -0500 (EST)
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Cc: alt-pross <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
> Subject: Re: Digital paper neg
>
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, James Romeo wrote:
>
>> I made a few digital paper negs. I made a few quick van dyke prints. Not bad
>> at all my exp time was 20 min the paper I used for the neg was xerox photo
>> quality mattte paper.
>> I have to do more work on it but how have a lot to learn on the photo shop.
>> I was very surprised at what I got.
>> James
>
>
> Jim, what printer was that? And did you wax it?
>
> Judy
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/06/01-04:55:39 PM Z CST