From: Katharine Thayer (kthayer@pacifier.com)
Date: 05/20/01-09:39:44 AM Z
This is what I meant, but perhaps did not say clearly enough, that the
reduced chromium compound can either be washed out (by which I meant
washed with water) or cleared with appropriate clearing agent if the
water isn't sufficient.
kt
Judy Seigel wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2001, Katharine Thayer wrote:
> > ....My theory says that the
> > reduced chromium compound is a contaminant which can be washed or
> > cleared out with appropriate clearing agents, but is not an integral
> > component of the image.
>
> There is also the possibility that simply long soak in water also flushes
> it out... If there is some *visibility* to the "contaminant" than I'd say
> it does, because I've put long-soaked gum print in "clearing bath" and
> seen no *visible* change.
>
> Judy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 07/12/01-11:29:40 AM Z CST