Re: That nasty stain, was double dipping

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Jeff Buckels (jeffbuck@swcp.com)
Date: 11/29/01-09:55:29 PM Z


I already have every issue, I think. Anyhow, I'll definitely re-read that article,
Judy. Thank you. -jb

Judy Seigel wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 jeffbuck@swcp.com wrote:
>
> > Again (I'm quivering with rage), most densitometer's don't work w/ pyro neg's
> > either!! Besides, I can't think of anything that would be more fulfilling
> > that spending $600 on a densitometer.... See where I'm going here? Any
> > suggestions? -jeff buckels
>
> Jeff,
>
> Sandy King has a long, lucid article titled "The Mystery and Science of
> Pyro" in Post-Factory #4, from origins and history, through historic and
> current formulas, the "Nature of Pyro," "Intensity of Stain," "Rotary
> Processing," "Sensitometry," options in development, his own "Pyrocat HD,"
> etc., etc., including the curves.
>
> For the cost of the postage I'll send as "free introductory issue." E-mail
> me offlist.
>
> I don't know the Weese & Sullivan method, but I would assume you could
> adapt the Post-Factory (Issue #1) white-card method to pyro. Expose, &
> develop a 21-step in pyro, print in your chosen medium, then read your
> pyro-developed negative against that. (Sandy: Yes? No?) But I note that in
> the article Sandy says you can read the pyro neg in the blue channel of a
> color densitometer, or with filter on b&w densitometer...
>
> Judy
>
> .................................................................
> | Judy Seigel, Editor >
> | World Journal of Post-Factory Photography > "HOW-TO and WHY"
> | info@post-factory.org >
> | <http://rmp.opusis.com/postfactory/postfactory.html>
> .................................................................


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/10/01-11:12:22 AM Z CST