From: Alejandro Lopez de Haro (alhr@wanadoo.fr)
Date: 10/30/01-04:27:28 AM Z
Hi Sandy:
I think your question is very cleaver. A question with an answer. Great.
BTW, I don't know who was the person who mention that Polaroid 55 was Kodak
Pan X. Well, I did my research and talked to several people, and perhaps to
a friend who I consider very knowledgeable in Polaroid matters, George
Dewolfe. He indeed confirm the following:
"Polaroid Type 55 PN is Panatomic-X and is made by Kodak for
Polaroid. It's actually the rollfilm version of Panatomic-X, not the
sheet film version, because of the flexible base it needs in the
holder."
Regards,
Alejandro López de Haro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandy King" <sanking@clemson.edu>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:08 AM
Subject: Re: Polaroid for POP
>
> But what would be the advantage of using a Polaroid film holder given
> the conditions established by the previous messages on this topic?
>
>
>
> Sandy King
>
>
> >George,
> >
> >> Out of curiosity, wouldn't it make more sense to just put Tri-X in
> >>holders and
> >> go that route?
> >
> >Not if you want to use a Polaroid film holder.
> >
> >Don Bryant
>
>
> --
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 11/02/01-08:55:27 AM Z CST