From: Wendy Mackender (haircuts1@bigpond.com)
Date: 09/07/01-08:44:28 PM Z
Thanks, I will give it a go.
Regards Wendy
----- Original Message -----
From: Christina Z. Anderson <zphoto@montana.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: Liquid Light
> Totally disagree. I had a bottle of liquid light for several years,
> unopened, on the shelf, hot and cold all year long through summer and
> winter, and it was great. Not only that, liquid light is said to be low
in
> contrast....no way. This was plenty contrasty. It was Rockland Liquid
> Light...the only way to prove this one way or the other is just go ahead,
> coat a sheet of paper, let it dry tack dry, and expose and develop it.
> You'll only waste about 5 min of coating time as opposed to throwing $30
> down the drain.
> Chris
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gary Miller <gmphotos@earthlink.net>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Liquid Light
>
>
> > If the liquid light has been frozen it may be useable. If it has been
> > refrigerated or on a shelf it is dead.
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 10/01/01-01:41:32 PM Z CST