From: Breukel, C (HKG) (cor@lumc.nl)
Date: 04/03/02-05:27:27 AM Z
..I recently tried to work with Reversal Dupe film, I couldn't get a
continous tone negative out of it. Dave S. pointed out to me that there
are cont. tone as well as lith. reversal dupe film around. Apperently I
have the lith version, which is no good for a enlarged neg, unless
you're lookin for a lith. "response" (the linear part of the film was
only over 1-2 stops)..
Perhaps something to keep in mind,
Best,
Cor
Keith Gerling wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> The film is "Polychrome Millenium 2000 PPf4". I have 12 boxes (50 sheets
> each) of the 30"x40". It doesn't appear to have a date printed anywhere,
> but it seems to be fine. I'd be happy to trade you even-up for lith film of
> a similar size. I'm not sure how we would manage the swap. (I could be
> very flexible, though, if, say, you happened to reside in a tropical
> paradise and if you, say, insisted that I be your guest for awhile. >grin<
>
> Keith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Kiss [mailto:bobkiss@caribsurf.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:54 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Reversing Dupe Film
>
> DEAR KEITH,
> I have an idea...I have been searching for large format duplicating film
> for a very long time! Which film do you have? Which manufacturer and what
> size(s)?? What quantities? How far out of date? Are you willing to let me
> try some?
> Kodak had discontinues any sizes of SO-132 greater than 8X10 and I need
> larger sizes. Why don't you sell me your film (because I WANT enlarged
> negatives from
> negatives in one step and because no one manufactures it any more) and use
> the money I send you to buy lith film!!!
> Seriously!
> CHEERS!
> BOB
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Keith Gerling <keithgerling@att.net>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:22 PM
> Subject: Reversing Dupe Film
>
> > Does anybody here know of any easy way to reverse-process duplicating
> film,
> > i.e., so that a positive will be the result of an enlarged negative,
> rather
> > than just a bigger negative?
> >
> > I know this is an oddball request, but I just bought a rather large amount
> > of outdated very large duplicating film that I had assumed was lith film!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Keith
> >
> >
> >
> ############################################################################
> #########
> > This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
> > by MailMarshal
> > For more information please visit www.marshalsoftware.com
> >
> ############################################################################
> #########
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 05/01/02-11:43:28 AM Z CST