From: Katharine Thayer (kthayer@pacifier.com)
Date: 04/10/02-03:33:51 PM Z
Sandy King wrote:
I would
> suggest that there is a much higher probability of some other
> explanation for David's result. Perhaps his gum got fogged from the
> long exposure - heat from the exposing light for an hour
If he got the result only from the 1- hour exposure, of course simple
overexposure would be the most likely explanation for it, and if he was
using a hot light without a cooling fan, his emulsion would surely be
cooked. But what he said was that he made a series of test exposures,
from 1 minute to 1 hour, and got the same result at all exposures, which
makes it quite unlikely that his result was primarily related to the
length of exposure.
kt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 05/01/02-11:43:29 AM Z CST