From: Gregory W. Blank (gblank@bellatlantic.net)
Date: 04/17/02-01:03:39 PM Z
Yes I believe for 35mm 2400 could be a tad higher,...I think in terms of 4x5
I rarely shoot 35 anymore.
I think you are getting better scans with color because your
C.I. index is higher than what mine would be. I use PMK+ always
but I shoot for a maximum highlight density of 1.25 I am projcetion printing
most of my work.
on 4/17/02 2:05 PM, Kerik Kouklis at kerik@kerik.com wrote:
>
>> Practically speaking is there a requirement for a 2400 Dpi scan.
>
> This really depends on the size of your original the size/resolution you
> are going to output to. If you're interested in scanning 35mm, that's
> probably pushing the limits of this scanner. I think one would be better
> off with a dedicated 35mm film scanner.
>
>> I can understand the reasoning behind higher bit depth 36 verses 48, whats
>> more, if I upgrade my photo elements to Photoshop 6 will photoshop 6 support
>> 48 bit scanning?
>
> Yes, Photoshop 6.0 does support 48 bit scans.
>
>> What kind of BW negatives (all kinds?) or Pyro ones?
>
> Two kinds: PMK Pyro and ABC+ (rollo) Pyro. Those are the only developers
> I use, although I'm soon going to give Sandy's Pyrocat HD a try.
>
> Kerik
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 05/01/02-11:43:30 AM Z CST