Re: I meant no disrespect!

From: Diana H. Bloomfield (dlhbloom@mindspring.com)
Date: 08/28/02-08:47:27 PM Z

• Next message: Judy Seigel: "let Sigmund Freud explain it all"
• Previous message: Jack Fulton: "Re: I meant no disrespect!"
• In reply to: Darryl Baird: "Re: I meant no disrespect!"
• Next in thread: Judy Seigel: "let Sigmund Freud explain it all"

Oh . . . it has to be "lens-based??" ;-)

Darryl Baird wrote:
>
> If you must pick a specific phrase in a really long post to get your
> hackles up, I'll try to be succinct. I have a sober regard for any
> religion which can shed so much blood in the name of it's deity. As
> such, yes, I can write off any religion that kills for "religious" reasons.
>
> I'd recommend staying with the tenuous, but still "on topic" alt-photo
> thread of sexuality in a lens-based medium. Dueling over matters of
> faith are doomed to go down in flame (wars.)
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Darryl
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> > Does having a sober regard for what we owe to the Judeo-Christian
> > background make someone a "religious conservative"? Or "religious" at
> > all? Do you think it is an acceptable understanding of the J/C background
> > to write it off as a source of sexual foibles? -jb

• Next message: Judy Seigel: "let Sigmund Freud explain it all"
• Previous message: Jack Fulton: "Re: I meant no disrespect!"
• In reply to: Darryl Baird: "Re: I meant no disrespect!"
• Next in thread: Judy Seigel: "let Sigmund Freud explain it all"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 09/19/02-11:02:50 AM Z CST