From: Jack Fulton (jefulton1@attbi.com)
Date: 12/17/02-09:45:30 AM Z
Pam, you've hit the nail on the head here. To a very minor degree my
stating of anti-photographic was to imply our assumption of reality has been
dependent upon what is normally perceived. Earlier, noting too, I have long
held an interest in pursuing the tele landscape but have not due it being
more a curiosity in my mind rather than a practiced concern. I actually find
recording my mobile reality of unending interest.
I appreciate your understanding of what I was attempting to say.
Jack
> I doubt that Jack Fulton is confused by this or anything else
> photographic. He's saying that with the loss of perspective, or severe
> distortion, caused by the telephoto, the image loses reality, therefore
> becomes non-photographic, non-real. That's what's so interesting about
> the process in landscapes.
>
> Pam
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 01/31/03-09:31:26 AM Z CST