From: Katharine Thayer (kthayer@pacifier.com)
Date: 12/22/02-02:48:42 PM Z
My Epson 1680 actually scans 35mm film better than my Nikon LS-2000; I
don't know the models so don't know how the 1680 compares to the 2450.
kt
Michael Healy wrote:
>
> Steve, check into the Epson 2450. For 35mm, it probably gets outdone by film
> scanners. But I scan 6x9 and 4x5, and it works out very well for
> me. David Brooks ran a review of it in Shutterbug about a year ago. Check it
> out. It isn't even all that expensive.
>
> Mike Healy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Bell" <veracity000@earthlink.net>
> To: "Alt Processes List" <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
> Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 7:29 PM
> Subject: oh dear
>
> Ok,
>
> i just priced the Nikon LS-4500AF, and of course it's ridiculously
> expensive. so does anyone know of alternatives to this? should i just use a
> flatbed?
>
> help!
>
> --- Steve Bell
> --- Veracity000@earthlink.net
> --- "We have...become our own thought police; but instead of calling the
> process by which we limit our own expression of
> dissent and wonder 'censorship', we call it 'concern for commercial
> viability'." -David Mamet
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 01/31/03-09:31:26 AM Z CST