From: Michael Healy (mjhealy@kcnet.com)
Date: 12/23/02-09:57:14 AM Z
Well whadday know?! Who are these guys, anyhow? Don't they KNOW bigger is
supposed to be better?! Where's their marketing integrity? Sorry, Katherine.
Boy, and maybe I should have invested in H-P instead.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: <satgre@att.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 6:29 AM
Subject: Re: oh dear
Mike,
Your terse reply wasn't quite right. While the 2450 ($399 at the Epson site)
has
a higher model number, its price is **less** than Katherine's 1680 ($800 or
more
depending upon the model).
Epson considers the 2450 a personal scanner, while the 1680 is called a
professional unit. From what I was able to find out on Epson's site, the
1680
has a higher DMAX and can handle up 8 x10 slides/negatives (with an optional
adapter -- which is included with their 1680 Professional models).
Dontcha wish that the numbering sequence has some relationship to price?
Maybe
Epson doesn't know that it's selling scanners in AMERIKA.
sG
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 01/31/03-09:31:26 AM Z CST