[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Pt/Pd printing with various lights
Title: Pt/Pd printing with various
lights
A few weeks ago I posted some preliminary
observations on the use of different UV sources with Pt/Pd. As
you may recall I exposed a Stouffer TP 45 step wedge to paper coated
with Dick Arentz' Pt/Pd Mixture #7, using the following light sources:
1) 20 watt Phillips BL, 2) 20 watt GE BLB, 3) 75 watt URI Super
Actinic, and a 1000 watt HID-Mercury Vapor lamp. Today I read
the densities of the tests and plotted curves with Davis' Plotter
program, with the following results.
BL
BLB
SA* HID
Speed Point
2.5
2.4
2.3 2.2
Exposure Scale
1.31 1.36
1.23 1.31
IDMax
1.17 1.20
1.23 1.31
* I also tested the 20-watt Phillips Super Actinic tubes and the
results were virtually identical to that of the 75-watt URI
tubes.
*The HID-Mercury Vapor lamp was tested with a center filter which
reduces printing speed by about two full stops. Without the center
filter this lamp is faster than at least one full stop than any of the
other lights.
For those not familiar with the above terms, here is some
explanation of terminology.
The Speed Point indicates the speed of the material and is
expressed here in relative terms. The higher the number the faster the
printing speed. The values are in log units where each value of 0.1
represents one-third of a stop, or 0.3 corresponds to one full stop.
Thus, the BL tubes turned out in these tests to be one-third of a stop
faster than the BLB tubes, two-thirds of a stop faster than the SA
tubes, and one full stop faster than the HID-Mercury Vapor lamp (with
the center filter).
Exposure Scale is the range between the minimum and maximum
density values required to print all of the tonal values. It is also
expressed in log values, with each 0.3 units corresponding to one
stop. An ES of 1.3, for example, corresponds to 4 1/3 stops. ES
relates to image contrast, the lower the number the higher the
contrast.
IDMax is the value that corresponds to 90% of maximum
black.
There have been quite a number of claims that Super Actinic tubes
are faster than BL and BLB tubes for printing in platinum. My tests
show the opposite. However, the SA tubes did produce images with more
contrast than any of the other lights.
Just for the record I ran the tests three times and the results
were very consistent. Over 95% of all readings of the three tests made
with a specific light source were identical, and no difference greater
than log 0.02 was observed.
Comments and questions about these tests are welcome.
Sandy King
--