From: Robert Newcomb (newcombr@gactr.uga.edu)
Date: 09/03/02-10:04:51 AM Z
Judy,
Ruth also put one young lady in a very large round bowl - is it just
rectangular boxes that you don't like or all types of containers? Girl in
a bowl is kind of like a Weston pepper in a funnel - form and shape.
Robert Newcomb
Judy Seigel wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2002 ARTHURWG@aol.com wrote:
>
> > ....Point well taken, Judy. But isn't the "frame" itself a kind of
> > two-dimensional "box"? Arthur
> >
>
> Surely you jest. But just in case --- EVERY photo has a frame, even
> man-mountain Dean, even Lisa Lyons -- or not-- & it is distinctly NOT part
> of "the image," from which it is generally separated ANYWAY by a mat.
>
> Only Ruth puts her babes (bland, blank, & usually supine) IN A REAL BOX.
> Why that was EVER considered creative and artistic I'll have to put on a
> long list of questions I cannot answer, but I feel honor bound to make the
> point.
>
> J.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 10/01/02-03:47:07 PM Z CST